Run an interview-coaching business, not a quiz widget
For coaches, placement cells and bootcamps who put candidates in front of real interviewers. Question banks, timed mocks that grade themselves, a real code sandbox, live interviews with shared notes, and a written report at the end.
AssessmentWho it is for
- An interview coach running structured programmes rather than ad-hoc calls
- A college placement cell preparing a cohort for recruitment season
- A bootcamp that promises mock interviews as part of the course
How it is used
- Build the programmeAssemble rounds from your question bank: aptitude, technical, coding, SQL or open questions.
- Candidates enrol and practiseTimed mocks grade themselves on submission, so candidates get a score without waiting on you.
- You run the interviewJoin the live session, ask your questions and take timestamped notes. Everything around the interview is already handled.
- The report goes outScores, weak areas and your notes become one report per candidate, published when you say so.
What it does
A question bank you build once
Nine question types, including coding and SQL, assembled into rounds and reused across every programme you run.
- Nine question types, aptitude through open-ended
- Coding and SQL questions with real execution
- Rounds assembled from the bank and reused
- Difficulty and topic tagging for targeted drills
Mocks that grade themselves
A timed mock test returns a score the moment it is submitted, so a candidate is not waiting on you to find out how they did.
- Timed tests with automatic submission
- Objective, coding and SQL answers graded on submission
- Code executed in a sandbox, not pattern-matched against an answer key
- Attempt history a candidate can see and compare
The live interview
Join the session, ask your questions, and take notes stamped to the moment they were made. More than one interviewer can write at the same time.
- Live interview sessions with the candidate
- Timestamped notes from multiple interviewers
- Session playback afterwards
- Peer interviews between candidates
What to practise next
Weak-area analysis reads every attempt a candidate has made and points the next drill at what it finds, so practice is aimed rather than repeated.
- Weak-area analysis across all attempts
- Drills targeted at the areas it identifies
- Résumé review as part of the programme
- Progress visible to the candidate and to you
The report
Scores, weak areas and your notes come together into one report per candidate, published when you decide it is ready.
- One report per candidate
- Scores, weak areas and interviewer notes in one place
- You control when it is published
- Kept with the candidate's record
How it is built
Code is run, not compared
A candidate's solution executes in a real sandbox and is judged by whether it works, which is the only judgement worth reporting.
Notes are timestamped and multi-author
A panel can write at once and the notes stay anchored to the moment in the session they refer to, so a debrief has something to point at.
Weak areas come from attempts, not opinions
The analysis is computed across everything a candidate has actually submitted, so the drill it recommends is evidence rather than a hunch.
Questions we get asked
Is the coding question really executed?
Yes. Candidate code runs in a sandbox and is graded on whether it works, not on whether it resembles a stored answer.
Can several interviewers take notes at once?
Yes, and every note is stamped with the moment in the session it was written, so the debrief has an anchor.
Who decides when a candidate sees their report?
You do. The report is assembled automatically but published only when you choose.
What does success look like for your project?
Tell us what you are building and where it is stuck. We reply within one business day with a straight answer on fit, approach and cost.